Home -> About Us -> Security & Privacy -> Terms of Use -> Add Url -> Add Your Article
Search:   
spunkycontent.com spunkycontent.com
Add Url
 

Teens & Children

Shopping & Auction

Self Healing

Music & Entertainment

Technology & Science

Society & Communities

Property & Estate

Finance & Investment

Home Family & Garden

Healthcare & Treatment

Drink & Food

Adventure & Sports

Indoor Games

Fitness & Health

Relationship & Lifestyle

Education & Learning

Automobile & Automotive

Careers & Employment

Travel & Vacation

Business & Companies

Issues & News

Computers & Software

Government & Politics

Culture & Art


 

  Home –› Fitness & Health –› Medicine & Medication
   
 

Benefits From Using An Independent Review Organization (IRO) For Hospital Peer Review Services

   
Author: Skip Freedman

Hospitals that have come to us for the first time for medical peer review services often have cases that have been either in litigation or subject to potential litigation for months if not years. We have been able to quickly help litigation teams and hospital quality managers gain clarity about these situations so they can more easily decide what their next course of action should be. In cases of litigation, if a hospital knows that their physician provider was at fault in a particular situation that leads to a bad outcome or a sentinel event, it makes more sense to settle those cases quickly, rather than incur more legal expenses by continuing to defend themselves.

When hospitals first experience successful case resolution through an outsourced peer review, they begin to believe that outsourcing to an independent review organization can have lasting benefits and should be done on a more systematic basis. Applying best practices and quality management to the process means that an organization is trying to reduce negative patient outcomes and sentinel events and, as a result, it will send a certain percentage its peer review committee cases out to an independent review organization to be looked at. Oftentimes, our clients send us cases in groups where were asked not to look just at bad outcomes.

The bad outcome cases might be interspersed in a larger sampling of cases where nothing went wrong at all, assuring that our peer specialists are getting a representative sampling of cases allowing for a high degree of objectivity in the review. So many hospitals have gone from an initial experience outsourcing a sensitive case to an IRO to using an IRO as a part of an ongoing quality management process. A systematic, proactive approach to sending out sensitive cases has been done for oncology groups, radiology groups and other specialty groups inside hospitals. We also review samplings for other specialty areas including general surgery, orthopedics and neurosurgery-- all with great results. Today outsourced peer review for hospitals and medical groups is rapidly being adopted as a best practice.

Author Bio:
Skip Freedman is a specialist in this area. Skip has written several articles in the past on this topic.
You can search for this article using: the cure, medicine, remedy, medications, acne medicine, medicine cabinets, bad medicine
 
 
 

Related Articles

 
Aromatherapy: Revive Your Senses
 
Hearburn Treatment
 
The Medical Community Changes Its Mind
 
Does Ephedra Really Shed the Pounds Like It Promises? I Decided to Put It to the Test!
 
Advocating for Competition Before the Courts
 
Are These 10 Healthy Foods Really Healthy?
 
The Truth About Fish Oil Toxins
 
Phentermine Diet Pills Save You From Obesity
 
Hernia - Causing Strain on Bowel or Kidneys
 
Osteopathic Manipulation Study: An Interview with Dr. Miriam V. Mills
 
 
 
   Home -> Security & Privacy -> Terms of Use
© 2006 www.spunkycontent.com - All Rights Reserved Worldwide